15 November, 2009

from my Twitter feed - #ShortFilmSunday - 11/15/09


"Dunny" by Phillip Van :: a lovelorn 11-yr-old boy tries to deliver letter to his object of desire...

"Swipe" by Max Blustin :: A lazy young man, refused cash by his girlfriend, resorts to other means.

"Bulletproof Vest" by May Lin Au Yong :: Nine-year-old Jyeshria wants a bulletproof vest.

09 November, 2009

a film about who?


When you don't have money but regardless you want to produce something worthwhile, something that speaks to your ambitions of making indelible motion pictures, then the penalty is always time and pure sweat equity. Well, at least it has been in my case.

afilmabout.us is my experiment in visual storytelling - crafting compelling visual narratives within a set of limited circumstances using limited resources, but with an overriding ambition to make unforgettable motion pictures, and in the process become a better storyteller.

When I started this project my goal was to build a team that would produce 8 short films for $2,000 per title in one year. Each film would be a snapshot of who we are as filmmakers at that precise moment - warts and all - so that by the end of the production cycle we would have a road map of our storytelling growth. The company would use equipment owned by the filmmakers, who would also write/direct/edit/score everything themselves. Because my particular trade is post-production, I'd develop scripts that would lean heavily in that direction, to relieve some of the burden of production value during shooting. As supervising producer for the project, my unifying idea behind all these proposed shorts was nothing more than "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts."

As vague as this notion was I wanted to work with other talented filmmakers to make this happen. I was able to attract the incredible talents of Peter Haas, a working editor I had the good fortune to go to college with, Larry McGovern, an engineer by trade and a stellar grip and AD, and Ron Moreno, as hard-working an actor as anyone could want to meet. The four of us made up the core filmmaking team, each bringing a passion and commitment this kind of no-budget endeavor really requires.

In some post-KLF fit of whimsy, I believed that if the same people were involved in all the projects that were developed under the afilmabout.us banner, then our true, undiluted collective creative voice would emerge irresistibly from that body of work... maybe not discernible close-up, but step back a ways and you'll see it.

And this is still probably true, but in the last eighteen months the "we can do it" bravado has given way to a more sober reality about our initial targets. My personal goal was to grow as an independent producer - learn the mechanics of "proper" film production, which I initially believed specifically meant working with SAG actors.

What I actually learned from my producing experience was (1) the scripts I was writing were too ambitious for the scope of production within my immediate means, (2) not every person who displays emphatic enthusiasm when volunteering their services just for credit and experience are going to pull through for you, so you better have a back-up plan, and (3) you simply can't ever, ever give up.

I know now, for example, how much it will realistically cost to produce the 11 page screenplay called "Footcandles." I also know that the sci-fi scripts we've been developing are a tad out of our reach at the moment - but that won't always be the case. These days I write scripts intended to be affordable and compelling (to me, anyway) and that can be shot efficiently with the tools that we've already developed - the proof of that being the more contained but no less dramatically ambitious short script currently entitled "On The Table."

"Undone," the web series that started it all, is in the last leg of post-production. I'll tell the story of that long, long production cycle some other time. But as the final stages approach it's tempting to frame that as an ending, but that's not the case. As it was always intended to be - it's a beginning.

2010 will be a very different year for afilmabout.us

...this was all intended to be a preamble to a discussion about another short film anthology project I had the good fortune to see, a project called "Wonder..." - but that'll have to wait till next time. So until then... good night, and good luck.

from my Twitter feed - #ShortFilmSunday - 11/08/09

"Angel of the Night" by @dannylaceyfilm :: (via @indiemoviemaker) a debut short horror film

"Myles West" by Bryn Chainey :: Kid steals his brother's iPod to live a fantasy secret agent life.

"Signs" by Patrick Hughes :: (via @mjodirector) Where do you find love? Sometimes you need a sign...

01 November, 2009

from my Twitter feed - #ShortFilmSunday - 11/01/09




Here are this week's links, somewhat hampered by YouTube being closed down for maintenance::

"Itmanna: Make a Wish" by Cherien Dabis :: (via @TribecaFilm)
a Palestinan girl goes to the bakery...

"Her Name Is Laura Panic" by @AdamWingard
...a sequel to his "Laura Panic", which is available on his website here

"Foster" by Jonathan Newman :: (via @shortcinema)
...a multiple award winning short featuring an impish leading actor...

29 October, 2009

Back to basics...

Great things are afoot, but today I'm thinking specifically about the feature script I'm developing for The dotUS Project. We're adopting the practical filmmaking philosophy of Marc Price, director of the no-budget zombie film "Colin" that dazzled Cannes this year with its reported $70 out-of-pocket price tag. I read a quote from Price (can't find the article now) where he encourages filmmakers to embrace making a feature with the resources they have access to right now, instead of waiting for the money.

So that's what we're doing. The script I'm developing takes place in one location (the place where I live), has five speaking parts, and doesn't require anything except minimal props and make-up - a thriller, currently entitled "Jacob," that takes place in a residential building in downtown Brooklyn.

Like 'Paranormal Activity' the film focuses exclusively on the interior of that shared living space. We're going for a lo-fi aesthetic, but to bring some richness to that we're embracing the cinematography of early 20th century horror - films also made for minimal budgets (by today's standards, certainly) that used striking expressionist lighting and camera, the kind pioneered and embraced by the German filmmakers of the 20s and 30s.

And you can help - we're making a list and checking it twice - the most striking horror films of that period that we're going to use as our role-models. Any and all suggestions for films we should watch are absolutely welcome. Here are a few lists I've found so far :


Share and enjoy : )

18 October, 2009

Tempus Fugit on Twitter

Good grief. Time has flown by since I updated this blog last. I've got a couple of good reasons - one being the ongoing post-production struggle for my most recent short film, the unfortunately titled "Undone" (Larry, my A.D., has long suspected that I've totally jinxed myself with that one... I choose to be less superstitious than that). More on that project later.

The other reason is Twitter.

I doubt I have anything new to say on the subject (of Twitter in particular or social networking in general), but I will say that when I finally embraced Twitter it was with the intention of becoming part of the independent film-making community. And I'm there. I've seen films I wouldn't otherwise have seen, films made by passionate outsiders to the commercial filmmaking industry, driven by passion and commitment to their craft - dream chasers all. And I'm proud to count myself among their number.

I could go on and on about what I've seen and who I've encountered on there... but it's something you have to experience for yourself. Like blogging, or in fact anything in this life, you get out of it what you put into it. If you haven't already, dip your toe in the wide river of flowing information on Twitter. There's something for everyone there... Maybe join me... @d0kk... Everyone I follow on there is absolutely worth following.

And 'Undone'? We're getting there, inch by inch. I approached this project as a neophyte producer, determined to learn from my mistakes. And I've made plenty. But we're nearly there. I'll keep you posted as we approach the first public screenings. Stay with me. It'll be worth it.

01 April, 2008

Inaction

Still digesting the roundtable discussion I went to at the Lincoln Center last Sunday, which was part of the the New Directors series being screened there this month. It's not so much what was said, because there wasn't a whole lot of new information. I was struck by the general lack of energy from the panel. The panelists were all filmmakers who had screened during previous New Director series, and the discussion was in part to illuminate how being included in that program had facilitated their careers as marginal, independent filmmakers.

Basically, it didn't. Oops.

I think that's where the lack of energy came from - the misconception of the panel discussion in the first place, and the awkward position that put the panelists in. Tamara Jenkins, for example, director of last year's acclaimed "The Savages," was animated when she spoke about her filmmaking experiences, but had little to add to the Q & A discussion about technology and distribution, about funding and the fight to get films made period. Likewise Michael Almereyda, Lodge Kerrigan, and the particularly bitter sounding Jim McKay.

The conversation was also mired by some indie posturing about how hateful it is to be casting for cash, the necessity to please funders in order to make movies, and lamentation of the lack of the state funding that is enjoyed overseas. The most positive and useful comments came from Su Friedrich and Tom Kalin, who at least appeared to grasp and engage the process of indie filmmaking. Both, interestingly, are prolific directors of short films, and coincidentally don't have the economic handicap of trying to raise families while working in the film industry. McKay's unhappy remarks about his needing to work on the TV show Law & Order for the money brought home the latter consideration.

It was also interesting to see how few people on stage wanted to take the reins of their own careers. The whole online distribution discussion, for example, was largely sidestepped, because none of the panellists have engaged that medium at all. Which surprised me. I don't think there was anybody talking who was that much older than me, but there was an uncomfortable reluctance to do more than speculate about what is involved. Kerrigan was clearly appalled at the idea of self-promotion, framing it with the word 'branding' and letting the post-Naomi Klien angst association envelope the room. 'Brand,' in the context of market awareness, is just another word for 'identity', and few at the table were able to articulate their filmmaking goals in those terms. I certainly didn't hear anybody mention David Lynch's nominal success in that department.

Perhaps the suggestion that the internet is somehow a panacea for independent filmmakers' distribution woes is just too naive for them to contemplate. The whole thing had the air of people too long stuck in the trenches, unable to see beyond the lip of their own foxhole. I hadn't really expected to see a bunch of people old before their time feel kind of helpless and sorry for themselves, but there was more than a little of that.

As was pointed out by the more than slightly jaded McKay, it's a young person's industry (apparently).